From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue May 21 22:46:12 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8E4E736;
 Tue, 21 May 2013 22:46:12 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from rfg@tristatelogic.com)
Received: from outgoing.tristatelogic.com (segfault.tristatelogic.com
 [69.62.255.118]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A17B3FE;
 Tue, 21 May 2013 22:46:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from segfault-nmh-helo.tristatelogic.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by segfault.tristatelogic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41E533AD8F;
 Tue, 21 May 2013 15:46:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@tristatelogic.com>
To: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: ports/178647: java/openjdk6 does not build (without extra hack)
In-Reply-To: <5192D78B.6090402@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 15:46:00 -0700
Message-ID: <68752.1369176360@server1.tristatelogic.com>
Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org, freebsd-java@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD <freebsd-java.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-java>,
 <mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-java>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-java@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java>,
 <mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 22:46:12 -0000


In message <5192D78B.6090402@FreeBSD.org>, you wrote:

>On 2013-05-14 19:56:23 -0400, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>> 
>> In message <5192C51B.9020509@FreeBSD.org>, you wrote:
>> 
>>> MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER=1 is not necessary unless you forced it.
>> 
>> I do not know what you are talking about.  I did not "force"
>> anything. I simply did:
>> 
>> portupgrade vlc
>> 
>> and then, in the configuration for vlc, there was an option to
>> support Blu-Ray menus by using libbluray... or something like
>> that... so I enabled that.
>> 
>> After that, portupgrade started to build the (new) dependencies for
>> vlc and that is when I got the failure building java/openjdk6.
>> 
>> The bug exists, it is real, and I did not "force" anything.
>> 
>> I believe that anyone and everyone will experience the exact same 
>> build failure as I reported if they also simply do what I did,
>> i.e. freshen your ports tree via "portsnap fecth update", and then
>> simply "portupgrade vlc" and then, in the config menu for vlc,
>> enable blu-ray menu support.
>
>I understand your frustration but I can't reproduce the problem at
>all.  In fact, I've heard/seen some intermittent complaints like this
>before[1] but I was never able to reproduce anything like that. :-(

Well, if you can't reproduce it, then I do understand that nothing
can really be done.

If I figure out a way to reliably reproduce it, I'll let you know.


Regards,
rfg