From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 7 22:15:34 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27F4237B66C for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 22:15:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e985FUY01418; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 23:15:30 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id XAA02691; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 23:15:29 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200010080515.XAA02691@harmony.village.org> To: Matt Heckaman Subject: Re: WU-FTPD Cc: Matt Dillon , Kenneth Mays , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 07 Oct 2000 21:09:10 EDT." References: Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2000 23:15:29 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message Matt Heckaman writes: : However, if you need the features that wu-ftpd provide, and want an FTPD : with a good track record, you can check out ProFTPD, which is a lot easier : to use and far more flexible than wu-ftpd. Apache style configureation is : quite nice to use. It's in the ports. :) I wouldn't chose it because of its track record. It has had as many or more security problems that wu-ftpd has had... There's nothing known there now, and it is generally believed to be as secure as wu-ftpd. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message