From owner-freebsd-current Sun Jun 14 02:36:59 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA12966 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sun, 14 Jun 1998 02:36:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from spinner.netplex.com.au (spinner.netplex.com.au [202.12.86.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA12953 for ; Sun, 14 Jun 1998 02:36:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au) Received: from spinner.netplex.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spinner.netplex.com.au (8.8.8/8.8.8/Spinner) with ESMTP id RAA04695; Sun, 14 Jun 1998 17:36:12 +0800 (WST) (envelope-from peter@spinner.netplex.com.au) Message-Id: <199806140936.RAA04695@spinner.netplex.com.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Amancio Hasty cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: poll and libc_r?? In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 13 Jun 1998 20:38:42 MST." <199806140338.UAA14088@rah.star-gate.com> Date: Sun, 14 Jun 1998 17:36:11 +0800 From: Peter Wemm Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Amancio Hasty wrote: > > > cc -pthread -o foox foox.c > /usr/lib/libc_r.so: undefined reference to `poll' > > According to John Birrell the culprit is in a checking in to: > libc/net/res_send.c > > We don't have poll support in libc_r and according to John it will > be difficult to add poll support to libc_r well at least it is not a > quick hack. I have a quick #ifdef for res_send.c so that it won't try to use poll() when building as part of libc_r. Or would it just be better to implement a libc_r poll()? > Amancio Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm Netplex Consulting To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message