From owner-freebsd-current Tue Apr 25 07:56:09 1995 Return-Path: current-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id HAA12693 for current-outgoing; Tue, 25 Apr 1995 07:56:09 -0700 Received: from trout.sri.MT.net (trout.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.12]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id HAA12680 for ; Tue, 25 Apr 1995 07:56:02 -0700 Received: (from nate@localhost) by trout.sri.MT.net (8.6.11/8.6.11) id JAA11107; Tue, 25 Apr 1995 09:00:21 -0600 Date: Tue, 25 Apr 1995 09:00:21 -0600 From: Nate Williams Message-Id: <199504251500.JAA11107@trout.sri.MT.net> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: current@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: TeX support in bsd.doc.mk? In-Reply-To: <199504251441.HAA00422@time.cdrom.com> References: <199504251441.HAA00422@time.cdrom.com> Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Jordan K. Hubbard writes: > How do people feel about adding in some standard handy rules for this? I'm not sure I follow? What kind of rules? > Sure, we don't supply TeX as part of the system but it's a pretty > convenient and oft-used add-on package and there are lots of docs written > in it that could use the nice simple Makefiles this would make possible. Are you talking build scripts for the existing packages? Nate