From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 15 18:25:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52FA3BEA for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 18:25:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-la0-f54.google.com (mail-la0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 886598FC14 for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 18:25:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f54.google.com with SMTP id j13so1841569lah.13 for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 10:25:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=DTeHhLLSzT9FJEee6uhgAGt1OGzjbcVd0G53xn0JsQ0=; b=j3O5QE5cYImUPnOau5dvDUuPOoojxjJEfLTDf6T3qHDB7x4DNY5VURLEB5+e6KpirB RHTgodVQwuqoiYYUZU5inlnoTIQOoM9QF7GZIx0qfRASNhKFjhGFV1cXO5Bka/uJXmBX ya4n43J1JqmeoZv80y48WYlSKyYgdtTN0YdvI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=DTeHhLLSzT9FJEee6uhgAGt1OGzjbcVd0G53xn0JsQ0=; b=VR8SNsbeTZUvQlomT30iy92MSbK8f7mi4KIe6E3+YZrnbbV8twpy2fAebXIBlWR15U eqfHIwV/pGYJwz6RXZ75tTR8yRe3b90V7V1iWv0UlphaJ80nWd0Cyo5E4XEAGBurWSYp wfsgjTGpl1d5qIZhl6hFGsXjd+J9ow0Q6NceaKjn8PzcWK4W1GSKV2tWbF6tkpBzmecM jSzNVEre6YEILoHaXJ/GpGCcnW4F1LplUchASPMQ8voxP7ea7IfX9B+hpPnO0Z8DWNJ3 faomZYxTHUDB2AQowSf7MBnMCd2gJp8XLcHw06Voy/1Zqt5I/Pz1zXH3ppbo8iDMy8ha GJfw== Received: by 10.112.100.102 with SMTP id ex6mr961465lbb.130.1353003922999; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 10:25:22 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: lists@eitanadler.com Received: by 10.112.25.166 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 10:24:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20121115163843.GH75103@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <201211151436.qAFEahgO099183@svn.freebsd.org> <20121115161242.GA88933@FreeBSD.org> <20121115163843.GH75103@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> From: Eitan Adler Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 13:24:52 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: -4Jgd89t2eM1Cj75SKQNb4B3q0E Message-ID: Subject: Re: svn commit: r307457 - head/Mk To: Baptiste Daroussin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmO2yGBdoMTSibQSaQ7flnHzcjdoXq9HI7D/8lC6+f4kblFEoTU5enpnjesfXaHICQNJ9mR Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, Alexey Dokuchaev , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, Ports Management Team X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 18:25:25 -0000 On 15 November 2012 11:38, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:22:47AM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote: >> On 15 November 2012 11:12, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: >> > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:08:06AM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote: >> >> On 15 November 2012 09:36, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: >> >> > New Revision: 307457 >> >> > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/307457 >> >> > >> >> > Log: >> >> > Add SOCKS and STROKE options standard descriptions. >> >> >> >> Can portmgr please make it more clear what is and isn't permitted >> >> during a feature freeze? >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/portmgr/implementation.html would seem to say >> >> that this commit is not allowed (any commit to bsd.*.mk) but I've seen >> >> already a few commits to this file. >> > >> > Oops, technically you're right, sorry, didn't catch that *any* part. On >> > the other hand, I do not think this particular commit can break anything, >> > plus we already had branched. I can grep -R just to make sure. >> >> To be clear: >> >> I want portmgr to clarify this. I *don't* want this to be disallowed. >> >> The problem is that there isn't any document that is actually being followed >> that says "this is okay, but that isn't". >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Eitan Adler >> Source, Ports, Doc committer >> Bugmeister, Ports Security teams > > Everything can't be written in a policy, or that would be so long that noone > will actually read it. > > We expect people to have some common sense. The main reason for this freeze is > to be able to have clean packages for the release and we don't want any commit > to break the tree so that we are sure to have the cleanest packages tree possible. > > So before committing ask yourself "does it ever has a chance to be able to break > things?" ... I agree. Can that page please be modified then to make this more clear? -- Eitan Adler Source, Ports, Doc committer Bugmeister, Ports Security teams