From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 4 17:50:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 5171185C; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 17:50:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 17:50:51 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Eitan Adler Subject: Re: svn commit: r308256 - in head/misc/figlet: . files Message-ID: <20121204175051.GB55521@FreeBSD.org> References: <201212041734.qB4HYC4A045663@svn.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, "David E. O'Brien" , ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 17:50:51 -0000 On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 12:44:04PM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote: > On 4 December 2012 12:34, David E. O'Brien wrote: > > New Revision: 308256 > > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/308256 > > > > Log: > > Run the tests to ensure a good build. > > Other ports use test: or regression-test: for this. Can we use the same? Seconded. Most users just hate delays in the builds caused by harness stuff. They expect software in ports to just work and are totally right in this will. Please hide this behind special target (I am not sure if it is test: or regression-test: -- I think we should agree on some standard name). ./danfe