From owner-freebsd-ports  Fri Oct  6 18:14:54 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from citusc17.usc.edu (citusc17.usc.edu [128.125.38.177])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93B7737B503
	for <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri,  6 Oct 2000 18:14:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from kris@localhost)
	by citusc17.usc.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA01188;
	Fri, 6 Oct 2000 18:15:30 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 18:15:30 -0700
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@citusc.usc.edu>
To: Espen Skoglund <esk@ira.uka.de>
Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: ports/21785: Update of audio/linux-realplayer
Message-ID: <20001006181530.B1096@citusc17.usc.edu>
References: <200010061950.MAA81520@freefall.freebsd.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <200010061950.MAA81520@freefall.freebsd.org>; from esk@ira.uka.de on Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 12:50:02PM -0700
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 12:50:02PM -0700, Espen Skoglund wrote:

>  Yes.  You're right.  The question, of course, is whether one wants to
>  use the Community Supported player or the player which is supported by 
>  RealNetworks.  I must say that I don't really know what the
>  differences between the two of them are.

The previous beta wasn't supported by real, what I think they're doing
is making it explicit that "this is code which will probably work, but
we don't have an obligation to fix problems". cs1 is a newer version
than b2

Kris


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message