From owner-cvs-all Thu Oct 12 17: 8:44 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from dt051n37.san.rr.com (dt051n37.san.rr.com [204.210.32.55]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A770337B502; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 17:08:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from slave (Studded@slave [10.0.0.1]) by dt051n37.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA20667; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 17:08:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@gorean.org) Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 17:08:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton X-Sender: doug@dt051n37.san.rr.com To: Matt Dillon Cc: Bill Fumerola , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc inetd.conf In-Reply-To: <200010122249.e9CMnch32431@earth.backplane.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, Matt Dillon wrote: > Hmm... I think you guys are missing my point. My point is that when > you throw a machine into a rack, DNS isn't likely to be configured > properly. True, but in order for this to matter the sendmail has to be configured to actually send something outside the box. I think it's reasonable to assume that anyone with the motivation to actually edit /etc/mail/aliases is also going to be sufficiently motivated to test it, and adjust DNS (or sendmail.cf) accordingly. B Doug -- "The dead cannot be seduced." - Kai, "Lexx" Do YOU Yahoo!? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message