Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 09:54:52 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Max Khon <fjoe@samodelkin.net> Cc: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>, FreeBSD Developers <developers@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, G??bor K??vesd??n <gabor@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Erwin Lansing <erwin@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/Mk bsd.emacs.mk bsd.gnome.mk bsd.mail.mk bsd.openssl.mk bsd.port.mk bsd.port.subdir.mk bsd.python.mk bsd.ruby.mk bsd.scons.mk ports/Tools/scripts security-check.awk ports/databases/p5-DBD-Oracle Makefile ports/databases/p5-sqlrelay ... Message-ID: <20060902135452.GA66538@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20060902124553.GA30093@samodelkin.net> References: <200608041234.k74CYoc1076722@repoman.freebsd.org> <44E389AA.3000003@FreeBSD.org> <44E38E2F.4000005@FreeBSD.org> <44E391AD.3010402@FreeBSD.org> <20060902124553.GA30093@samodelkin.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--9amGYk9869ThD9tj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 07:45:53PM +0700, Max Khon wrote: > Hi! >=20 > On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 11:44:13PM +0200, G??bor K??vesd??n wrote: >=20 > > >>I think the solution proposed in PR/100555 is overengineered. Why not= =20 > > >>to build temporary binary package as usually and then use chroot(8)= =20 > > >>(or -C flag for pkg_install) to install it into DESTDIR environment?= =20 > > >>This would be *much* simpler approach and it won't require modifying= =20 > > >>anything but bsd.port.mk. Putting additional load on port maintainers= =20 > > >>on keeping their ports DESTDIR-clean is too much for such a niche=20 > > >>feature. > > > > > >Just to make clean: what I am proposing is the following course of=20 > > >actions when DESTDIR is defined: > > > > > >1. Build port as usually. Install it as usually. > > > > > >2. After usual installation is complete build temporary binary package= =20 > > >out of it and install it into DESTDIR environment. > > > > > >Automating it would require some amount of work, granted, but it would= =20 > > >be one time task, not constant burden on port maintainers. > > > > > >-Maxim > > I don't think it would be good, since: > >=20 > > 1, The package building requires that the package be installed first,= =20 > > and we don't want to make the host environment dirty in such way. >=20 > I think this should be fixed. Nobody else requires package to be installed > first. It's probably an enormous task, but please feel free to work on it. Kris --9amGYk9869ThD9tj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFE+Y0sWry0BWjoQKURAhXGAKDw+eH+JqOAilpJHzUSqBrn2/rKEACg4ewm L1XDzTgChhTQtSs6m9hS5cQ= =7mH6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9amGYk9869ThD9tj--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060902135452.GA66538>