From owner-freebsd-current Thu Dec 31 06:03:32 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA02819 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Thu, 31 Dec 1998 06:03:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from axl.noc.iafrica.com (axl.noc.iafrica.com [196.31.1.175]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA02586; Thu, 31 Dec 1998 06:03:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sheldonh@axl.noc.iafrica.com) Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.noc.iafrica.com) by axl.noc.iafrica.com with local-esmtp (Exim 2.10 #1) id 0zvieE-0006Pb-00; Thu, 31 Dec 1998 16:00:22 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: "Jonathan M. Bresler" cc: alexandr@mail.eecis.udel.edu, committers@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Postfix is coming. new uid, gid required. In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 31 Dec 1998 05:30:42 PST." <199812311330.FAA29862@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1998 16:00:22 +0200 Message-ID: <24650.915112822@axl.noc.iafrica.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 31 Dec 1998 05:30:42 PST, "Jonathan M. Bresler" wrote: > well....that's a sticky question, we quickly get into the realm of > opinion You're right, and I have no wish to pour fuel on menacing embers. However, I would like to suggest that it might be more appropriate as a port until FreeBSD starts shipping _without_ sendmail. It seems silly to have both in the src tree. If this comment does not generate a "Wow, he's absolutely right", I beseech fellow list members to leave it alone altogether. It's only an opinion and doesn't require discussion if it isn't massively supported by people who count. :-) Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message