From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org  Sat Dec 16 21:39:37 2017
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAD43E90231;
 Sat, 16 Dec 2017 21:39:37 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from franco@lastsummer.de)
Received: from host64.shmhost.net (host64.shmhost.net [213.239.241.64])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EF187576D;
 Sat, 16 Dec 2017 21:39:36 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from franco@lastsummer.de)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:25:233:fdab:6f2a:e35c:4ef2] (unknown
 [IPv6:2001:470:25:233:fdab:6f2a:e35c:4ef2])
 by host64.shmhost.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 460A316D07B;
 Sat, 16 Dec 2017 22:39:25 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: Option vs. flavor?
From: Franco Fichtner <franco@lastsummer.de>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (15C114)
In-Reply-To: <11f773c6-7f69-0a4a-d100-018d40a65f48@rawbw.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2017 22:39:23 +0100
Cc: Ben Woods <woodsb02@gmail.com>,
 "ports@freebsd.org" <ports@freebsd.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F2167B1B-9F8D-403D-8BDF-11E3507214F2@lastsummer.de>
References: <ee10fa7f-9107-1c35-8540-ff34d306865d@rawbw.com>
 <20171216142849.GL10752@graf.pompo.net>
 <CAOc73CAe03AuLsgSvw1TfV7Ke9qLvGJtHpqowvF=KPnMOxOjxg@mail.gmail.com>
 <00619a7a-a812-1eac-bdb7-5cecfb891758@rawbw.com>
 <CAOc73CAqp9=-8T8czbhk3CP6B2iftkqdXau10JNzmPUXHF0UXg@mail.gmail.com>
 <11f773c6-7f69-0a4a-d100-018d40a65f48@rawbw.com>
To: Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com>
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at host64.shmhost.net
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.0
X-Spam-Status: No score=-1.0 tagged_above=10.0 required=10.0
 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2017 21:39:37 -0000

Why not use a separate data package as optional dependency? Solves the condi=
tional fetch.

> On 16. Dec 2017, at 22:02, Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com> wrote:
>=20
>> On 12/16/17 12:42, Ben Woods wrote:
>> Is there any reason why you want to avoid the download with the port =E2=80=
=9Cmake
>> fetch=E2=80=9D?
>=20
> To not clog the package builder with huge unnecessary data? Or maybe this s=
houldn't be a concern.
>=20
>> This should not impact you if it uses subpackages and you just install th=
e
>> program with pkg.
>=20
>=20
> But are subpackages already available?
>=20
>=20
> Yuri
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"