Date: Tue, 13 Jun 1995 16:04:21 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb@kryten.atinc.com> To: Terry Lambert <terry@cs.weber.edu> Cc: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Which CTM# == 2.0.5R? Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9506131523.F1056-0100000@kryten.atinc.com> In-Reply-To: <9506131730.AA00943@cs.weber.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 13 Jun 1995, Terry Lambert wrote: > I have noticed absurd propagation delays that weren't there before > the lists were sorted, the delays being only on some lists. huh!! > There is an 8 hour discrepancy betwwen hackers and questions in some > cases, whereas before at least I knew that the messages had come in > from each list were equally delayed. both hackers and questions are using bulk_mailer to distribute the messages. the delays should be similar. announce, hackers and questions are the only lists that are using bulk_mailer, they are the largest lists that freefall carries. the rest use sendmail with one-time sorted lists. > Possibly what is happening is that what you are seeing is the result > of having crossposted the message between hackers and current, so > you in effect are seeing the results of two mailings. yes, hackers and Current, not questions > Honestly, I was getting "OK" response times before, "Good" response > times after the list sort, and now I get a mix of "Great", "Good", > "OK", "Bad", and "Absolutely Abysmal" since the list split. each list has mixed response times, or a mix when comparing the lists? Jonathan M. Bresler jmb@kryten.atinc.com | Analysis & Technology, Inc. | 2341 Jeff Davis Hwy play go. | Arlington, VA 22202 ride bike. hack FreeBSD.--ah the good life | 703-418-2800 x346
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.3.89.9506131523.F1056-0100000>