From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 4 12:30:53 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 355D2D89; Thu, 4 Jul 2013 12:30:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B74DB121E; Thu, 4 Jul 2013 12:30:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r64CUpL9046978; Thu, 4 Jul 2013 16:30:51 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2013 16:30:51 +0400 (MSK) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: Andrey Chernov Subject: Re: svn commit: r252608 - in head: include lib/libc/stdlib In-Reply-To: <51D55FC5.7040703@freebsd.org> Message-ID: References: <201307032121.r63LLtkk022011@svn.freebsd.org> <20130704120336.G1176@besplex.bde.org> <51D4ED7F.5050800@freebsd.org> <20130704142324.K1670@besplex.bde.org> <51D55FC5.7040703@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 6B691B03 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (woozle.rinet.ru [0.0.0.0]); Thu, 04 Jul 2013 16:30:51 +0400 (MSK) Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Bruce Evans X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2013 12:30:53 -0000 On Thu, 4 Jul 2013, Andrey Chernov wrote: > >> We already pass that moment in the past, changing old&bad formula with > >> new one which cause the same effect: non-repeating sequence in the very > >> global scope. We already agree that repeating depends on something like > >> OS release numbers. I can't find that discussion right now. > > > > But you are changing it in between releases. > > Development and stable branches are not official releases. sorry for nitpicking: ther is quite large difference between official/unofficial status and users/vendors expectations regarding interface/APIs stability. development (aka -current or head/) is not, while stable (aka stable/*/) are, ate least they are great subject to POLA. -- Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] [ FreeBSD committer: marck@FreeBSD.org ] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------