From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 3 08:54:59 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: doc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DCA8575 for ; Thu, 3 Apr 2014 08:54:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shell.gmplib.org (gmplib-02.nada.kth.se [130.237.222.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12169D61 for ; Thu, 3 Apr 2014 08:54:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by shell.gmplib.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B9D4618E15; Thu, 3 Apr 2014 10:54:56 +0200 (CEST) To: Warren Block Subject: Re: Downplaying a serious issue References: <861txffcgh.fsf@shell.gmplib.org> From: Torbjorn Granlund Sender: tg@gmplib.org Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 10:54:56 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Warren Block's message of "Wed\, 2 Apr 2014 21\:43\:28 -0600 \(MDT\)") Message-ID: <86sipu7py7.fsf@shell.gmplib.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: doc@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 08:54:59 -0000 Warren Block writes: =20=20 Do we? What should it say? Please be specific, preferably in the form of a PR. Is this really a doc problem? =20=20 Full disclosure. Don't downplay. Both the scope and the gravity of the issue is grossly downplayed here The truth is that FreeBSD/i386 10 is completely unusable under all three major type 1 virtualisers. It should not be used, or one will cause data loss. It might be embarrasing to fess up about bugs, but downplaying serious issues make people lose confidence. Which is worst? Torbj=C3=B6rn Please encrypt, key id 0xC8601622