From owner-freebsd-security Wed Aug 12 03:36:39 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id DAA07593 for freebsd-security-outgoing; Wed, 12 Aug 1998 03:36:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from eri.erinet.com (console.erinet.com [207.0.229.28]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id DAA07583 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 1998 03:36:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from richard@eri.erinet.com) Received: from localhost (richard@localhost) by eri.erinet.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id GAA21577 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 1998 06:33:11 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1998 06:33:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Richard Stanaford To: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: UDP port 31337 In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.19980812112915.0092ead0@mail.scancall.no> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org LOL.. Oh man that is devious. >:) It's almost worth the effort of coding it just to see those lusers scratch their head wondering why it doesn't work quite the way it's supposed to. Muahaha!!! ;) - Richard. On Wed, 12 Aug 1998, Marius Bendiksen wrote: > Imagine a backorificed running on Unix machines, pretending to be a > 'legitimate' Back Orifice installation, fully configurable, etc... ? :) > > --- > Marius Bendiksen, IT-Trainee, ScanCall AS To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe security" in the body of the message