From owner-freebsd-current Tue Apr 30 03:23:13 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id DAA26051 for current-outgoing; Tue, 30 Apr 1996 03:23:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tfs.com (tfs.com [140.145.250.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id DAA26046 for ; Tue, 30 Apr 1996 03:23:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter.tfs.com by tfs.com (smail3.1.28.1) with SMTP id m0uECXe-0003vqC; Tue, 30 Apr 96 03:20 PDT Received: from localhost.dk.tfs.com (localhost.dk.tfs.com [127.0.0.1]) by critter.tfs.com (8.7.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id KAA03287; Tue, 30 Apr 1996 10:20:05 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: critter.dk.tfs.com: Host localhost.dk.tfs.com [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol To: Paul Richards cc: wosch@cs.tu-berlin.de, bde@zeta.org.au, jkh@time.cdrom.com, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Files installed to /etc, (was: review request) In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 30 Apr 1996 11:10:11 +0100." <199604301010.LAA17456@cadair.elsevier.co.uk> Date: Tue, 30 Apr 1996 10:20:05 +0000 Message-ID: <3285.830859605@critter.tfs.com> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > > /usr/share/etc > > > > That would be obviously wrong. It is >not< shareable, now even inside > > the same architecture. > > Why isn't it? Until it's edited and installed in /etc it should be just > a template that would be host independant and entirely shareable? Yes, host independent, but not architecture independent... /etc/rc for instance has to be architecture dependent to initialize weird HW... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.