From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Mar 24 23:41:23 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id XAA11425 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 24 Mar 1995 23:41:23 -0800 Received: from star-gate.com (hasty.vip.best.com [204.156.141.143]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id XAA11419 for ; Fri, 24 Mar 1995 23:41:18 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by star-gate.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id XAA01112; Fri, 24 Mar 1995 23:10:33 GMT Message-Id: <199503242310.XAA01112@star-gate.com> X-Authentication-Warning: star-gate.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6alpha 2/16/95 To: Nate Williams cc: hackers@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: httpd as part of the system. In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 24 Mar 1995 23:42:55 MST." <199503250642.XAA26789@trout.sri.MT.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 24 Mar 1995 23:10:30 +0000 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > > I would like to propose that we add the following two components to our > > > system in an effort to both: > ... > > 3. exmh (a tcl/tk wrapper for mh it also understands MIME) > > Why would we add a tool to mh as part of the standard system when mh is > NOT part of the standard system? It seems kind of foolish to me. Is not foolish obviously is by implication. I really feel that in order to have an Internet Out Of The Box type system we do need a grahical interface to mail. This is 1995 and not a throw back to the early 70's. >(And NO, we're not going to add specific mailers to the distribution. It's Hashed out by whom ?? Amancio