From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 1 20:10:14 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 947A41065670; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 20:10:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1F228FC12; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 20:10:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id XAA03159; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 23:10:12 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1QnyoW-000EfT-66; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 23:10:12 +0300 Message-ID: <4E370823.4000707@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 23:10:11 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110706 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jung-uk Kim References: <201107312128.29322.lobo@bsd.com.br> <201108011223.55772.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <4E36F88C.7050404@FreeBSD.org> <201108011548.03059.jkim@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <201108011548.03059.jkim@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Phenom II 975 BE shows 0 celsius X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 20:10:14 -0000 on 01/08/2011 22:48 Jung-uk Kim said the following: > I have mixed feeling about this because I own a system with such > CPU/motherboard combo, too. I also believe it works well but errata > is errata. If vendor says we shouldn't use it, then we shouldn't. > In fact, I am just following Linux as an example here but I have no > problem with turning this into a warning message, either. Let's cut a deal :-) If we start using amdtemp for fan control, emergency system shutdown or similar, then we follow the strict path. Until then, while we use amdtemp to amuse users with numbers, let's just print a warning :-) -- Andriy Gapon