From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Apr 22 17:04:47 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id RAA07445 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 22 Apr 1995 17:04:47 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id RAA07439 for ; Sat, 22 Apr 1995 17:04:46 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.cdrom.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: hackers@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: What's going on with 2.0.5. Date: Sat, 22 Apr 1995 17:04:46 -0700 Message-ID: <7438.798595486@freefall.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Just thought I owed everyone a status report, so here it is.. I'll try to be brief, thus conserving both your time and my own! Wcarchive died on the operating table when we attempted to add 3 drives to it. We didn't attempt to do anything especially creative, we simply optioned and plugged 3 more drives into our expansion rack. Of course, this is a PC we're talking about here, the notorious Chihuahua of the hardware world, so no one was particularly surprised by these antics. We pushed too hard and it fell over! Happens all the time! Since then, wcarchive has been hauled back up to Concord and gone into major overhaul mode. Its motherboard, always been somewhat flakey and weird with the 192MB of memory (this very early ASUS we're talking here), has been replaced. The aging 1742 in it that had also finally decided that its natural lifespan had been exceeded has been replaced, though we're making another field trip out today to hopefully settle the overall controller situation since the Bt747c is now unhappy with its life! Things are not happy in wcarchive's case. This came at a bad time for all concerned, naturally, given the degree of overlap in our amount of concern for wcarchive (our most visible baby on the Internet) and our release schedule for 2.0.5. Also not comforting have been some of the problems encountered in trying to get wcarchive to run 2.0-current (we *really* need 4GB partitions on that machine!) with the 2742 controllers. Justin has discovered some interesting things about the later revisions of these controllers, and I think that I can easily forsee some patches coming out of that in the next few days. Since the AHC support is a pretty vital component of 2.0.5 (a lot of people are using these things!), I would also say it'd be worth holding the release an extra day or two for that alone. Suffice it to say that 2.0.5 is going to slip ANYWAY. We want a chance to test wcarchive under more serious load, find and fix the things that cause it to fall over and then take that final "it's not running too bad, boss!" collection of bits and call it 2.0.5. Those working on wcarchive will be also be somewhat distracted away from 2.0.5, as you'd expect, and I have no immedate estimate as to the amount of slippage that will result. I can at least say with some authority that 2.0.5 will NOT be going out this weekend! :-( Thanks. Jordan