From owner-freebsd-current Thu Mar 9 17:32:49 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from alcanet.com.au (mail.alcanet.com.au [203.62.196.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F019037B8D9; Thu, 9 Mar 2000 17:32:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jeremyp@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au) Received: by border.alcanet.com.au id <115241>; Fri, 10 Mar 2000 12:33:32 +1100 Content-return: prohibited From: Peter Jeremy Subject: Re: SMP on Alpha? In-reply-to: <200003100103.UAA21838@dufus.video-collage.com>; from mi@video-collage.com on Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 12:06:18PM +1100 To: Mikhail Teterin Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Message-Id: <00Mar10.123332est.115241@border.alcanet.com.au> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii References: <200003100103.UAA21838@dufus.video-collage.com> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 12:33:31 +1100 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 2000-Mar-10 12:06:18 +1100, Mikhail Teterin wrote: >Will the -current version of FreeBSD run on a multi-CPU axp machine and >use all of the CPUs? Not yet, but Real Soon Now. > Would that be a reliable box (assuming the admin >sometimes knows what he is doing)? -current comes with all the usual `not for production use' caveats, and (without any slur on Doug Rabson, who's doing the work), you'd be very game taking FreeBSD's first cut at Alpha/SMP and putting it into production. Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message