From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 29 00:59:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A57D116A4CE for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 00:59:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccmmhc91.asp.att.net (sccmmhc91.asp.att.net [204.127.203.211]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2194F43D5A for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 00:59:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stephen@math.missouri.edu) Received: from [10.0.0.4] (12-216-243-9.client.mchsi.com[12.216.243.9]) by sccmmhc91.asp.att.net (sccmmhc91) with ESMTP id <20041129005910m9100cdtkje>; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 00:59:10 +0000 Message-ID: <41AA745E.3070400@math.missouri.edu> Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 18:59:10 -0600 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041116 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stable@freebsd.org References: <02a201c4d2b7$451a82f0$cbc1a10a@Curs3> <20041128.174946.105188774.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20041128.174946.105188774.imp@bsdimp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: 5.2 -> 5.3 without single mode? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 00:59:11 -0000 M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: > dima <_pppp@mail.ru> writes: > : > Is it possible to cvsup from 5.2 to 5.3 without booting in single mode? > : > I have a remote machine and want update it, but it is no console access, > : > only SSH. > : You don't actually need to reboot in single-user mode. Just make sure your users wouldn't use the server hard during the > : # mergemaster -p > : # make installworld > : # mergemaster > : cycle. You can basically disable all the services but sshd for that task & enable them again after the second reboot. > > While you don't NEED to go into single user (I do the above all the > time), you are setting yourself up to get screwed the first time that > a new, common system call is introudced... > So if there is a new common system call introduced, will it arrive with a nice entry in UPDATING plus a HEADS UP? Stephen