From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 23:56:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 170A416A4CE for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2004 23:56:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C33EF43D62 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2004 23:56:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lgrady@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id f1so31353rne for ; Tue, 02 Nov 2004 15:56:30 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=UmvMEKwUhKway9auvOmm5d4hsUS3TarQV7sw8QPJ2B6Nvzkcx2Knn34D449bAon0Ulwer1umIFpGbkuKbKzJzynmL9Q20DTWgm4+V7TEiMbKa/ppf1fINMPRnGjvu93p1znO7MrpGrS+86ZxKxMIC3fkvh8U/Zt2C0lH2AB/rsI= Received: by 10.38.208.7 with SMTP id f7mr549696rng; Tue, 02 Nov 2004 15:55:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.22.44 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Nov 2004 15:55:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5fee5e300411021555185e32df@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 17:55:55 -0600 From: luke To: Jamie Ostrowski In-Reply-To: <20041101144538.H92548@floyd.gnulife.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20041101144538.H92548@floyd.gnulife.org> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem with 4 port Intel nic X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: luke List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 23:56:34 -0000 > It looks like it may be an IRQ conflict. Here is my dmesg output when > the kernel detects the card: > > http://www.gnulife.org/dmesg.txt > > It looks like ports 0 and 2 are both sharing irq 4 and 1 and 3 are > sharing irq7. Is there a problem with this? If so, any idea how I can get > around it? Thanks! is there anything else using irq 7? pciconf -lv or dmesg|grep irq will show you what irq's are being used. the parallel port usually uses irq 7 so you might have to change it. i have three nics in my firewall and they use irqs 10,11, and 14. might want to try using those(if something else isn't already) --luke