From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 4 08:44:06 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C7BF1065672 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 08:44:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from auryn@zirakzigil.org) Received: from mail.giulioferro.it (mail.giulioferro.it [85.18.102.52]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 089A38FC27 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 08:44:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from auryn@zirakzigil.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.giulioferro.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0792B33C3A; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:46:34 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at giulioferro.it Received: from mail.giulioferro.it ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (aurynwork1sv1.giulioferro.it [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FLyp80cwf84W; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:46:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from aurynmob2.giulioferro.it (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: gferro@giulioferro.it) by mail.giulioferro.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C2C233C18; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:46:31 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4A278950.8010802@zirakzigil.org> Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 10:44:00 +0200 From: Giulio Ferro User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090323) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" References: <4A205679.5030406@zirakzigil.org> <20090531134541.H3234@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <20090531134541.H3234@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Scott Ullrich Subject: Re: NAT-T on current 8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 08:44:06 -0000 Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: >> >> The NATT patch is slated to hit the FreeBSD tree soon so please do >> report back your findings. > > Yes, in case you find any positiv or negative things we'd be happy to > hear back from you - or anyone else who's going to give it a try. > Sorry for late feedback, very little time on my hands... I've tried to interoperate with an old version of ipsec-tools (0.6.7) and it takes a long time to start working, but it does in the end. I didn't have much time to try anything more in-depth, but I'll keep you posted. Thanks again.