Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:31:49 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Ken Smith <kensmith@buffalo.edu> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, TAKAHASHI Yoshihiro <nyan@FreeBSD.org>, Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org>, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r227536 - in head: release share/man/man7 Message-ID: <20111117143149.GA96475@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <1321535020.82271.5.camel@bauer.cse.buffalo.edu> References: <201111151849.pAFInR3K012609@svn.freebsd.org> <20111116.232828.343708041526200614.nyan@FreeBSD.org> <4EC3D40A.5040204@freebsd.org> <1321457050.78238.10.camel@bauer.cse.buffalo.edu> <20111117124210.GB2051@garage.freebsd.pl> <1321535020.82271.5.camel@bauer.cse.buffalo.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 08:03:40AM -0500, Ken Smith wrote: > On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 13:42 +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:24:10AM -0500, Ken Smith wrote: > > > Or both? We're heading in the direction of having both for the FTP > > > server tree. > > > > > > Kinda gross but "FBSD-9.0-RELEASE-amd64-amd64-bootonly.iso"? > > > > Can't we use one if they are equal? > > I'd prefer consistency. [...] But it looks so plain stupid! > I picture a higher percentage of people being confused about why some > architectures have one name while other architectures have two versus > people being confused about all of them having two names. And people would have to believe that we as a Project are so dumb that we could not figure out how to avoid this trivial redundancy when it is clearly not anywhere being useful. :-( ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111117143149.GA96475>