From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 29 11:16:24 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DD401065673; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:16:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from theraven@FreeBSD.org) Received: from theravensnest.org (theravensnest.org [109.169.23.128]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B95848FC0C; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:16:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (cpc1-cwma8-2-0-cust257.7-3.cable.virginmedia.com [82.20.153.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by theravensnest.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2TBGJPl068413 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 29 Mar 2012 12:16:20 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from theraven@FreeBSD.org) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 From: David Chisnall In-Reply-To: <4F73D8A0.3040608@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 12:16:14 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <201203220848.q2M8mia8015593@svn.freebsd.org> <20120325105958.GB61230@zxy.spb.ru> <4F73D8A0.3040608@FreeBSD.org> To: Doug Barton X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, Stanislav Sedov , Ivan Voras , Slawa Olhovchenkov , svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r233294 - in head: . contrib/com_err crypto/heimdal crypto/heimdal/admin crypto/heimdal/appl crypto/heimdal/appl/afsutil crypto/heimdal/appl/ftp crypto/heimdal/appl/ftp/common crypto/he... X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:16:24 -0000 On 29 Mar 2012, at 04:36, Doug Barton wrote: > All of the stuff that pkgng relies on (including the tool itself) are > going to be in the ports collection, where they belong. We should have > moved pkg_* there years ago, but this change is at least a step in the > right direction. Wait... what? Why should pkgng be in ports (other than now, while it's = under development)? I'd like to see it used for managing some of the = optional parts of the base system and probably eventually replacing = freebsd-update, not have it as another bolt-on that is not part of the = core system. Not to mention the bootstrapping problem if every user who = wants to use binary packages needs to use ports to build pkgng. David=