From owner-freebsd-net  Wed May 20 03:23:48 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id DAA06270
          for freebsd-net-outgoing; Wed, 20 May 1998 03:23:48 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from labinfo.iet.unipi.it (labinfo.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.5])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id DAA06260
          for <net@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 20 May 1998 03:23:43 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it)
Received: from localhost (luigi@localhost) by labinfo.iet.unipi.it (8.6.5/8.6.5) id KAA11503; Wed, 20 May 1998 10:40:02 +0200
From: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>
Message-Id: <199805200840.KAA11503@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>
Subject: Re: struct ifnet handling...
To: eivind@yes.no (Eivind Eklund)
Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 10:40:02 +0200 (MET DST)
Cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <19980520122038.42758@follo.net> from "Eivind Eklund" at May 20, 98 12:20:19 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

> > I am not considering more sophisticated optimizations like 'hmmm this
> > test was done earlier so let's just skip it'.
> 
> These are the optimizations I'm considering, mostly.  And "let's add
> test e which will distinguish whether to run test a&b or test c&d'.

that's good to hear because i know close to nothing on how to do this
kind of optimizations :)

	cheers
	luigi

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message