From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 4 12:34:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB43C16A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2004 12:34:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif3-6-0-cust204.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.103.67.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EF9043D5D for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2004 12:34:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from setantae@submonkey.net) Received: from setantae by shrike.submonkey.net with local (Exim 4.42 (FreeBSD)) id 1CES2S-0007br-5b; Mon, 04 Oct 2004 13:34:00 +0100 Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 13:34:00 +0100 From: Ceri Davies To: Dave Horsfall Message-ID: <20041004123400.GF2493@submonkey.net> Mail-Followup-To: Ceri Davies , Dave Horsfall , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <20041002081928.GA21439@gothmog.gr> <20041002102918.W22102@fw.reifenberger.com> <20041002085143.GA52519@gothmog.gr> <84ekke3i34.fsf@plab.ku.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cuksurJxElusDw39" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-PGP: finger ceri@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: Ceri Davies cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Protection from the dreaded "rm -fr /" X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 12:34:02 -0000 --cuksurJxElusDw39 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 08:27:45PM +1000, Dave Horsfall wrote: > On Mon, 4 Oct 2004, Dmitry Karasik wrote: >=20 > > I just wonder, if 'rm' is so fearful to you, why bother changing rm(1)? > > Write a simple wrapper around, as many sysadmins do for their needs, and > > use it instead of rm. >=20 > Precisely. >=20 > This is -hackers; why do we need to be protected from ourselves? All the world is not -hackers. Ceri --=20 I hear thought presenting the problem. -- dadadodo -c 1 Mail/trhodes --cuksurJxElusDw39 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBYUM3ocfcwTS3JF8RAkWcAJ9MOtk4QdDyGg9AKTsfYWuc6xDnwACeICuu CIlyiEwBc68TYclZDBGaT2M= =6428 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cuksurJxElusDw39--