Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2013 18:50:34 +0100 From: Chris Rees <crees@FreeBSD.org> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> Cc: Kenta Suzumoto <kentas@hush.com>, "ports@freebsd.org" <ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: The vim port needs a refresh Message-ID: <CADLo83-Aei9rPBGU6qGe=9Dqx%2BkKZrhZ4V7h7DwMHr29ymSQnQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20130607185627.GA9433@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <20130524212318.B967FE6739@smtp.hushmail.com> <CADLo83_AgAH0fARvtoYYmw5UEf7%2B3nEEs6U%2B6%2BhY8r0MbTkWFw@mail.gmail.com> <20130607185627.GA9433@dragon.NUXI.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 7 June 2013 19:56, David O'Brien <obrien@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 09:50:50AM +0100, Chris Rees wrote: >> For years, people have been begging him to get over his fear of >> OPTIONS, and he sits in the way of progress against almost everyone's >> wishes. > > It's funny -- it's not just my fear of options -- every FreeBSD using > co-worker I talk to frequently about OPTIONS do not like them either. What's not funny is your dreadful attitude at replying to email. The number of timeouts on the vim and bash ports are shameful, and we're stuck with two bash ports because you're too lazy to keep the main one up to date. I really have no idea why you're still allowed to plant your flag in the ports tree and stand in the way of progress. Please consider dropping the ports, so people who are happy to keep them up to date and don't ignore bug reports can work on them. Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo83-Aei9rPBGU6qGe=9Dqx%2BkKZrhZ4V7h7DwMHr29ymSQnQ>