From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 24 07:05:42 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBFDD37B401 for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 07:05:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dsl-mail.kamp.net (mail.kamp-dsl.de [195.62.99.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D280B43F85 for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 07:05:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from me@farid-hajji.de) Received: (qmail 12157 invoked by uid 505); 24 Jul 2003 14:05:43 -0000 Received: from me@farid-hajji.de by dsl-mail by uid 502 with qmail-scanner-1.14 (spamassassin: 2.43. Clear:. Processed in 0.153882 secs); 24 Jul 2003 14:05:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO reverse-213-146-117-189.dialin.kamp-dsl.de) (213.146.117.189) by dsl-mail.kamp.net with SMTP; 24 Jul 2003 14:05:43 -0000 From: Farid Hajji To: root@bofh.bg, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 16:05:37 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 References: <1059026035.3f1f7473bdde3@mail.orbitel.bg> In-Reply-To: <1059026035.3f1f7473bdde3@mail.orbitel.bg> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200307241605.37581.me@farid-hajji.de> Subject: Re: OT: X aperture X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: me@farid-hajji.de List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 14:05:43 -0000 On Thursday 24 July 2003 07:53 am, root@bofh.bg wrote: > Hello again! > Sorry for trolling. > I have just found one more way to have X and seculevel coexisting. > It's applicable for desktops mostly.Here's the trick: > Start the system with seculevel "-1", run startx and then type > '/sbin/sysctl -w kern.securelevel=1' in a terminal. The last requires as > all know requires root privileges or sudo. Yes, already said that. But if the X server crashes or exits, you won't be able to start it again without rebooting. That's why OpenBSD's APERTURE option is superior. > Thanks for your patience, > Dimitar Vassilev -- Farid Hajji. http://www.farid-hajji.net/address.html