Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2010 17:31:36 +0200 From: Dick Hoogendijk <dick@nagual.nl> To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> freebsd questions" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: zfs question Message-ID: <4C5ECDD8.9060006@nagual.nl> In-Reply-To: <4C5EA29B.7040401@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <4C5E9874.3030606@nagual.nl> <4C5EA29B.7040401@infracaninophile.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 8-8-2010 14:27, Matthew Seaman wrote: > Yes. It works very well. > On amd64 you'll get a pretty reasonable setup out of the box (so to > speak) which will work fine for most purposes. Of course, if your > system has particularly demanding IO patterns, then you may have to > tweak some loader.conf or sysctl parameters to get the best results. > But that's hardly unique to ZFS. Yes, you're quite right. ;-) But now you mention it: my virtual installation under virtualbox is i386. So, I guess it's better to reinstall, because the server is amd64. I also think that will be better in future use of ZFS (needs 64bits to be happy. Am I right in believing I need the amd64 version (w/ ZFS) above the i386 one?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C5ECDD8.9060006>