From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 5 17:46:54 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC6251065674 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 17:46:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nox@saturn.kn-bremen.de) Received: from smtp.kn-bremen.de (gelbbaer.kn-bremen.de [78.46.108.116]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D03E8FC1C for ; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 17:46:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nox@saturn.kn-bremen.de) Received: by smtp.kn-bremen.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id C7E4B1E0027E; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 18:46:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from saturn.kn-bremen.de (noident@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by saturn.kn-bremen.de (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n25HjNoD004964; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 18:45:23 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from nox@saturn.kn-bremen.de) Received: (from nox@localhost) by saturn.kn-bremen.de (8.14.2/8.13.6/Submit) id n25HjMvK004963; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 18:45:22 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from nox) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 18:45:22 +0100 (CET) From: Juergen Lock Message-Id: <200903051745.n25HjMvK004963@saturn.kn-bremen.de> To: kalinoj1@iem.pw.edu.pl X-Newsgroups: local.list.freebsd.emulation In-Reply-To: <20090305010525.GA69474@volt.iem.pw.edu.pl> Organization: home Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kqemu and devfs - any luck? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 17:46:55 -0000 In article <20090305010525.GA69474@volt.iem.pw.edu.pl> you write: >Hello, > >I'm trying to set up kqemu (kqemu-devel from -current) to be accessible to usual >non-wheel users. I've created a ruleset that looks like this: > ># devfs rule show >100 path kqemu mode 666 Try: path 'kqemu*' ... (kqemu uses device cloning.) >200 path kqemu unhide > Not sure that works with cloning as expected, at least it doesn't do anything here... >than I do ># devfs rule applyset > That also didn't work here, I did: /etc/rc.d/devfs restart >but sadly my /dev/kqemu are still owned by root:wheel and have 660 >permissions. I'm proceeding exactly in the way that's described in man 8 devfs. > >Maybe someone else succeded with this and could give me a tip on how to >cope with this issue? Or maybe someone can at least confirm that it does >not work, and the PR should be posted? I'm working on a -CURRENT >system.. 7-stable here... HTH, Juergen