From owner-cvs-all Wed Nov 28 8:35:45 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-64-165-226-105.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.165.226.105]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5588E37B41B; Wed, 28 Nov 2001 08:35:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 16B6A66B27; Wed, 28 Nov 2001 08:35:34 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 08:35:33 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Robert Watson Cc: Vincent Poy , Kris Kennaway , John Baldwin , cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, Dirk Meyer Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/freebsd-uucp Makefile distinfo pkg-pli Message-ID: <20011128083533.B44865@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20011128034906.K5788-100000@oahu.WURLDLINK.NET> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MfFXiAuoTsnnDAfZ" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG on Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 10:51:53AM -0500 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --MfFXiAuoTsnnDAfZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 10:51:53AM -0500, Robert Watson wrote: > IOn Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Vincent Poy wrote: >=20 > > > > Doesn't 4.3 have the built-in uucp support still? > > > > > > Yes. We probably shouldn't build this on 4.x since it's not needed. > >=20 > > I guess the only reason to build this is to have it there before > > doing the 4.4-RELEASE buildworld upgrade of the OS just in case one > > forgets about this.=20 >=20 > I've been wondering if we don't need an UPDATING entry for UUCP, > suggesting that: >=20 > (1) The user install the UUCP package in the future, if they use UUCP > or > (2) They garbage collect the UUCP binaries scattered around the system: > they still present a security risk, and won't be deleted in the > upgrade unless it's a reinstall. It should be there on -current (probably already is, I can't check right now). It's stil in RELENG_4 so nothing needs to happen there. > BTW, was the security problem ever actually fixed in the seperate UUCP > distribution? If not, we may need to add a warning to the package. Yes, it was pulled out of -current post security fix. Kris --MfFXiAuoTsnnDAfZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8BRJVWry0BWjoQKURAhpvAKDZdO4M7zUJRDGedQtF2I5nyMkX6ACeM9Wm NOVLoL8tnTly2+1ZUc08ZU8= =3Pxh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MfFXiAuoTsnnDAfZ-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message