From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 26 14:50:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3522516A4CE for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 14:50:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from argent.heraldsnet.org (argent.heraldsnet.org [64.83.41.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F4BE43D31 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 14:50:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jtrigg@spamcop.net) Received: by argent.heraldsnet.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 31C7B372; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 10:50:18 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 10:50:18 -0400 From: Jim Trigg To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20041026145018.GB82343@spamcop.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <0800C9A6-264C-11D9-BB05-000A958C81C6@ahze.net> <26FD3DFA-264E-11D9-BB05-000A958C81C6@ahze.net> <20041025175035.K11535@frambozen.monochrome.org> <20041026104948.GH6513@alzatex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041026104948.GH6513@alzatex.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to . Subject: Re: flash X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 14:50:20 -0000 On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 03:49:48AM -0700, Loren M. Lang wrote: > On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 08:19:53AM +0200, Gert Cuykens wrote: > > goddammit :) > > > > 7rxI# make install > > ===> flashpluginwrapper-0.20021113 is only for i386, and you are > > running amd64. > > Isn't amd64 supposed to be fully compatible with i386? Maybe the port > just doesn't reconize that fact. The only other thing might be if > firefox is compiled as amd64, u might need to recompile it as i386 but > don't take my word for it. Yes and no. A single program (for example, mozilla plus plugins) must be entirely either native AMD64 or ix86, not mixed. So you'd need a mozilla (and any needed shared libraries) built for ix86. Jim -- Jim Trigg, Lord High Everything Else O- /"\ \ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN Hostmaster, Huie Kin family website X HELP CURE HTML MAIL Verger, All Saints Church - Sharon Chapel / \