Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 19:56:07 -0500 From: Alexander Kabaev <kabaev@gmail.com> To: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Import libyaml into base Message-ID: <20130304195607.4823f548@kan.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <CAC8HS2HKBRc-%2B93p--f-0u8jOm9xJKb6dC1D3rwSL9dTbARGxw@mail.gmail.com> References: <20130302165239.GB27078@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <CAC8HS2HKBRc-%2B93p--f-0u8jOm9xJKb6dC1D3rwSL9dTbARGxw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sig_/V_DM/a=cpF+xesvF/QyV_PN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 21:55:20 +0000 "Simon L. B. Nielsen" <simon@qxnitro.org> wrote: > On 2 Mar 2013 16:52, "Baptiste Daroussin" <bapt@freebsd.org> wrote: > > I want to import libyaml into base as libbsdyml so that no ports > > will use > it > > like we do for expat. > > > > I need it for the pkg bootstrap, so it it can parse pkg.conf. > > > > I know that some of the bhyve people will also be glad to use it. > > > > libyaml is MIT licensed, it is stable: no abi/api revolution in it > > for a > while. > > > > Does anyone have an objection? >=20 > I don't but please add a stub manual page telling people not to use it > outside base. >=20 > Simon We dealt with this in the past by renaming the library that goes into the base to be something else than its upstream variant, witness libbsdxml. Should this be done to libyaml-in-base as well? --=20 Alexander Kabaev --Sig_/V_DM/a=cpF+xesvF/QyV_PN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFRNUKuQ6z1jMm+XZYRAjE8AKCkBelkYs/1LqovV7UfnoUUqvhq+wCgyV0k Dg2hpbIRpUKqA+TW26JKfCU= =cE4X -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/V_DM/a=cpF+xesvF/QyV_PN--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130304195607.4823f548>