Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 2 Sep 2015 15:22:10 -0700
From:      Xin Li <delphij@delphij.net>
To:        "Pokala, Ravi" <rpokala@panasas.com>, "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Quick question: sc(4) vs vt(4)
Message-ID:  <55E77692.4050709@delphij.net>
In-Reply-To: <D20CC2A1.143F43%rpokala@panasas.com>
References:  <D20CC2A1.143F43%rpokala@panasas.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

[-- Attachment #1 --]
On 09/02/15 15:13, Pokala, Ravi wrote:
> Hi folks,
> 
> vt(4) says:
> 
>      kern.vty
>              Set this value to `vt' or `sc' to override the default driver
>              used for the system console.  By default, sc(4) is used on
> com-
>              puters that boot from BIOS, and vt is used on computers that
> boot
>              from UEFI.
> 
> 
> Are there any known problems using vt(4) rather than sc(4) on systems
> booting with BIOS? One of our folks noticed that sc(4) has a bunch of
> dependencies, a bunch of which that are for obsolete hardware (AT
> keyboards and their controllers, splash screens, etc), that vt(4) does not.

I don't expect any problems with it used in systems that uses BIOS.  In
fact, one would have to use vt if they want to use DRM2, and I
personally used it for quite some time on my Lenovo T530, and there
isn't any glitch related to vt(4) in the past year that I can remember.

Cheers,
-- 
Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net>    https://www.delphij.net/
FreeBSD - The Power to Serve!           Live free or die


[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.1.7 (FreeBSD)
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=2Am9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?55E77692.4050709>