Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 05 Feb 2004 18:04:43 -0500
From:      Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com>
To:        ".VWV." <victorvittorivonwiktow@interfree.it>
Cc:        freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: looking for hire workers on GTK 1.x
Message-ID:  <1076022283.751.72.camel@gyros>
In-Reply-To: <000d01c3ec3a$fdc8cf00$60d0fea9@workstation>
References:  <000d01c3ec3a$fdc8cf00$60d0fea9@workstation>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--=-J3uht0T5v51L21X/nrjj
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 17:54, .VWV. wrote:
> Hi.
>=20
> I'm managing a couple of powerful CISC workstations. FreeBSD keeps all of
> the products safe on UFS filesystem. One station has only multiple ATA
> disks, the other one has SCSI disks driven by an ICP Vortex SCSI controll=
er.
>=20
> I mustn't upgrade anything at all on these computers, running FreeBSD 4.6=
.2
> and 4.7.
>=20
> I have a self-styled step-style frontend for the WIN applications.
>=20
> I need a working Nautilus 1.0.6 as GTK filemanager and file prewier,
> matching the same style - GTKstep -.
>=20
> I don't trust in Linux' filesystems enough. Instead of FreeBSD 'amnesiac'
> 4.6.2 or 4.7, I could also choose Slackware 'darkstar' 8.1 or Red Hat
> 'walhalla' 7.3, having the same frontends, but I especially trust - and f=
eel
> at home - in FreeBSD.
>=20
> I am stubborn, if Nautilus 1.0.6 runs on Linux, it must also run on FreeB=
SD.

It did, and could again.  You just have to check out an older ports
tree.  Using cvs, checkout a ports tree from July 14, 2003.  That tree
should still have x11-fm/nautilus which is a working port of Nautilus
1.0.6 for FreeBSD (I know it works because I used for a long time).=20
Note, that is the last ports tree you can use given your current setup.=20
The next day, Nautilus was removed from the system in favor of the GNOME
2 stuff.

Joe

>=20
> The GTK 1 environment has all the components needed, even if badly writte=
n
> or Linux-dedicated. I have seen the absurd amount of patches needed to
> compile on our FreeBSD clean unix.
>=20
> I'm looking for a 'hire debugger' able to fix the problems.
>=20
> With my best regards
>=20
> VITTORI
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-gnome-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
--=20
PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc



--=-J3uht0T5v51L21X/nrjj
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBAIswLb2iPiv4Uz4cRAoTNAJ4zFkcr0wDXOXCq1KhLAvZAk6mlQwCfVBPs
/m9h113qc83fYUiEVBnraxA=
=De9F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-J3uht0T5v51L21X/nrjj--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1076022283.751.72.camel>