Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 15:38:18 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> To: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@freebsd.org> Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r542221 - in head/www: flashplayer linux-flashplayer Message-ID: <20200714153818.GA19650@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <202007141515.06EFFN7x098890@repo.freebsd.org> References: <202007141515.06EFFN7x098890@repo.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 03:15:23PM +0000, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > New Revision: 542221 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/542221 > > Log: > Update to 32.0.0.403. > > Modified: > head/www/flashplayer/Makefile > head/www/linux-flashplayer/Makefile > head/www/linux-flashplayer/distinfo > > ... > @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ > > PORTNAME= flashplayer > PORTVERSION= 32.0 > -PORTREVISION= 18 > +PORTREVISION= 19 Is there a reason to abuse PORTREVISION instead of PORTVERSION=32.0.0.387 like in the other port? I didn't search the history, but if there is, perhaps it deserves a comment in the Makefile. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20200714153818.GA19650>