From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Tue Jul 14 15:38:19 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AB22366F16; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 15:38:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B5l6272Wlz4284; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 15:38:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id D80EA1357A; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 15:38:18 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 15:38:18 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Jung-uk Kim Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r542221 - in head/www: flashplayer linux-flashplayer Message-ID: <20200714153818.GA19650@FreeBSD.org> References: <202007141515.06EFFN7x098890@repo.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <202007141515.06EFFN7x098890@repo.freebsd.org> X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 15:38:19 -0000 On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 03:15:23PM +0000, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > New Revision: 542221 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/542221 > > Log: > Update to 32.0.0.403. > > Modified: > head/www/flashplayer/Makefile > head/www/linux-flashplayer/Makefile > head/www/linux-flashplayer/distinfo > > ... > @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ > > PORTNAME= flashplayer > PORTVERSION= 32.0 > -PORTREVISION= 18 > +PORTREVISION= 19 Is there a reason to abuse PORTREVISION instead of PORTVERSION=32.0.0.387 like in the other port? I didn't search the history, but if there is, perhaps it deserves a comment in the Makefile. ./danfe