From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Apr 21 09:05:38 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35B1FD3B9C3 for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 09:05:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) Received: from NAM04-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092010104.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.10.104]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "Microsoft IT SSL SHA2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D100E221 for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 09:05:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=+JcGMeCvX7SPIlw4YnAD+nBXp44Ncb3CaqRULowvLMw=; b=JWUD6zwc5RktxHLTmnYnVvbtxQT45Pm46UYpbwGA3yrjzQO/sud8ERx35NFoiiMjNWfjWSMcp/iHT2WEFGNp5+HwQNIdBEs+yf3X2ug9C9pU5CzAYYMq4mi8Y6+B44Of16ZbY4piZF9rqrq+UL870P4b06cuPk+gI1VhQggJQBvD8X89LqbF53G2v62GU2LCUQ0txknSbunQAi7suMkQz/zKPJcyoGFbJHoWIYFmRSlpqxepnNC2PV8nuGCwzFURPid5CHXEXC8nqeE5Xzr47tVVAy+eJO3RWBGwMPCSziauvlfrdHiqkpO6dLiQBaWMTNxC7/U9mRflkEew4TA3Zw== Received: from BN3NAM04FT017.eop-NAM04.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.92.55) by BN3NAM04HT241.eop-NAM04.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.93.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.1047.9; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 09:05:35 +0000 Received: from CY1PR20MB0363.namprd20.prod.outlook.com (10.152.92.55) by BN3NAM04FT017.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.92.147) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1047.9 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 09:05:35 +0000 Received: from CY1PR20MB0363.namprd20.prod.outlook.com ([10.164.0.29]) by CY1PR20MB0363.namprd20.prod.outlook.com ([10.164.0.29]) with mapi id 15.01.1047.013; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 09:05:35 +0000 From: Gerard Seibert To: User questions Subject: Re: gnupg and gnupg2 Thread-Topic: gnupg and gnupg2 Thread-Index: AQHSun5vTggSl0BlHEiGsJNsVrOf/Q== Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 09:05:35 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Reply-To: User questions Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: freebsd.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;freebsd.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=outlook.com; x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:E54A9402D6523808868A93CB40CF21113D3A0773A85CB89F313C2F10EFC31AEE; UpperCasedChecksum:C001D1AF18AA9487CCFF46E7E7D4C00F4C7DF4448A4293F4FE9E8596ED259924; SizeAsReceived:8066; Count:43 x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN3NAM04HT241; 5:YfQmM28ctikR0e7155HA7N8tCd/JMTpbSelIvbldYGtkdlrrgTp0JnA9tRfgeU5s01sqIfwq9wC0U17Bv2ngYryPtTPPmbmWmJb7t/jN19mSq+n5kxVxRd63if5eTAAHUyk170KA07GTzlIcZ6TWeg==; 24:eVdZ7Z0PYOPiTiLKoqHXK9LIsKChJ2tAuQieDWfTD/sbQ9incwP0ddgPUeQG8KcjLGG1yQ6467/lv/Am8hJh22PeLd9QKm5er7qjSAzLmHU=; 7:Q5CUqj1mtai9HfFRkYHPsmMwq+4/YWCNSHHFS9QgLsrpjB5N4pYveAUxmBYNNHVzdeIp+gC7Steuyk6fixYURew/tdMjQD1BZBdOeze0CvkgWi0/b2tjbQL7SAn9Lm3e7b9qOJqwpW9upIcn0IOqwGM/8+bFGLEAifhi7TRdntsxy71uT1nPLWaxjocloW8AwL03vAckKYLcCULpH+j8OJGrD6xDAXs/tPHjFnWzE5sCpc0afNX/dUOOxQH3S+fpmLpHwiIKfEh+evXYpEbXKyg9JVRCkDbgf7F2srW3GW7txkAz8PCxnT6rybi8cPs0 x-incomingheadercount: 43 x-eopattributedmessage: 0 x-forefront-antispam-report: EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(7070007)(98901004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1901; SCL:1; SRVR:BN3NAM04HT241; H:CY1PR20MB0363.namprd20.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 32d67b40-348f-4a58-16c1-08d4889591dd x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(201702061074)(5061506573)(5061507331)(1603103135)(2017031320274)(2017031324274)(2017031323274)(2017031322274)(1601125374)(1603101448)(1701031045); SRVR:BN3NAM04HT241; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(444000031); SRVR:BN3NAM04HT241; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BN3NAM04HT241; x-forefront-prvs: 02843AA9E0 spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1B19F3D8D64092469EB2D01AF0D8969F@namprd20.prod.outlook.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 21 Apr 2017 09:05:35.6179 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN3NAM04HT241 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 09:05:38 -0000 On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 20:46:58 -0400, Jim Ohlstein stated: =20 > On Apr 20, 2017, 8:27 PM -0400, David Mehler , > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I've got a 10.3 system. I just noticed I've got both gnupg 1.4 and > > gnupg 2.0. My question is can I get rid of gnupg1 and use the > > gnupg2? > They're both ports, not part of base. Evidently you have at least one > port that relies on each. Perhaps running "pkg info -r gnupg20" and "pkg info -r gnupg1" might help. Actually, the latest version in port is "gnupg-2.1.20" You might be able to remove the other two versions and just link to that one. --=20 Carmel