From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 21 12:20:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33D9D1065679 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:20:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6EDB8FC24 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:20:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2LCKDoJ041934 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:20:13 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q2LCKDQK041933; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:20:13 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:20:13 GMT Resent-Message-Id: <201203211220.q2LCKDQK041933@freefall.freebsd.org> Resent-From: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org (GNATS Filer) Resent-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, Shane Ambler Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CEEE106566B for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:16:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nobody@FreeBSD.org) Received: from red.freebsd.org (red.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48AA88FC17 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:16:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from red.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by red.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2LCGBvG088298 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:16:11 GMT (envelope-from nobody@red.freebsd.org) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by red.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id q2LCGBdd088297; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:16:11 GMT (envelope-from nobody) Message-Id: <201203211216.q2LCGBdd088297@red.freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:16:11 GMT From: Shane Ambler To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org X-Send-Pr-Version: www-3.1 Cc: Subject: misc/166293: clang regression from 9.0 to 9-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:20:14 -0000 >Number: 166293 >Category: misc >Synopsis: clang regression from 9.0 to 9-STABLE >Confidential: no >Severity: serious >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Wed Mar 21 12:20:13 UTC 2012 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Shane Ambler >Release: 9.0-RELEASE >Organization: >Environment: FreeBSD leader.local 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #1: Wed Feb 15 16:03:18 CST 2012 root@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 >Description: I am testing some builds with tinderbox and as a dependancy I need to build opencv-core. The sample logs compare a tinderbox build using releng/9.0 amd64 against one using stable/9 amd64 - both with CC=clang CXX=clang++ CPP=clang-cpp ARCH=amd64 set in scripts/etc/env/build.{BUILDNAME}. I get the same issue with stable/9 ARCH=i386 builds as well as 10-CURRENT. My base system is 9.0-RELEASE with a clang built world/kernel on a corei5 with 8GB There is another open pr mentioning an opencv clang failure -- pr-160856 -- It is a different error (from 9.0 beta2) that would appear to have been fixed before 9.0 release. My tinderbox 9.0 jails were compiled 12/march - svn checkout .../releng/9.0 - the 9-STABLE jails 21/march - svn checkout .../stable/9 A build using 9.0-amd64-clang will compile opencv-core A build using 9-STABLE-amd646-clang does not, with the opencv-core compile ending in an assertion failure followed by a stack dump. tinderbox log for 9.0 - http://pastebin.com/rAa08mWe tinderbox log for 9-stable - http://pastebin.com/QeCC0WNW >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: