From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 16 15:57:28 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABFEE16A468; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:57:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5975613C458; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:57:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 062312082; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:57:20 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Tests: AWL X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: -0.2/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on tim.des.no Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3993F207F; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:57:19 +0100 (CET) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 19DFC84460; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:57:19 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: "Igor Mozolevsky" References: <478930D2.90806@digifonica.com> <200801161009.55401.jhb@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:57:19 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Igor Mozolevsky's message of "Wed\, 16 Jan 2008 15\:27\:19 +0000") Message-ID: <86wsq9kbkw.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: njl@freebsd.org, bruno@freebsd.org, Stefan Lambrev , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Maxim Sobolev Subject: Re: powerd adaptive mode latching X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:57:28 -0000 "Igor Mozolevsky" writes: > That could be something to do with the rate of throttling of powerd; I > can't remember how long it was exactly, but under the default setting > it would take powerd 9s to go from 100MHz to full clock speed [...] Do you really have 18 steps, or did you have a higher ival? Have you tried setting ival to something like 100 ms? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no