From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Jan 18 14:00:44 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id OAA01130
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 18 Jan 1997 14:00:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id OAA01124
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat, 18 Jan 1997 14:00:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.4/8.6.9) with ESMTP id NAA06000; Sat, 18 Jan 1997 13:59:40 -0800 (PST)
To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
cc: dennis@etinc.com (dennis), hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Commerical applications (was: Development and validation 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 18 Jan 1997 13:47:05 MST."
             <199701182047.NAA12461@phaeton.artisoft.com> 
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 1997 13:59:40 -0800
Message-ID: <5996.853624780@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> And in some respects, FreeBSD has refused to learn this lesson, being
> too proud to be 2nd to market with Linux technology (or SVR4 technology)
> because "it's not BSD'ish enough").

"Such as?"

If you raise issues like dos emulation I'll also throw things at you
because this, like many other Linux features, has not succeeded due to
lack of knowledgable bodies to do the work rather than some anti-SV4
mindset at work.

				Jordan