From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Jan 26 00:14:00 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA23382 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 26 Jan 1998 00:14:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from news1.gtn.com (news1.gtn.com [194.77.0.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA23342 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 1998 00:13:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andreas@klemm.gtn.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by news1.gtn.com (8.8.6/8.8.6) with UUCP id JAA09499; Mon, 26 Jan 1998 09:00:14 +0100 (MET) Received: (from andreas@localhost) by klemm.gtn.com (8.8.8/8.8.7) id IAA15696; Mon, 26 Jan 1998 08:36:22 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from andreas) Message-ID: <19980126083622.14648@klemm.gtn.com> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 1998 08:36:22 +0100 From: Andreas Klemm To: Nate Williams Cc: Eivind Eklund , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: why not CVS server support ? References: <19980125175618.10691@klemm.gtn.com> <19980125183247.09801@follo.net> <199801251932.MAA28784@mt.sri.com> <19980125204353.52228@klemm.gtn.com> <199801252036.NAA29040@mt.sri.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88 In-Reply-To: <199801252036.NAA29040@mt.sri.com>; from Nate Williams on Sun, Jan 25, 1998 at 01:36:29PM -0700 X-Disclaimer: A free society is one where it is safe to be unpopular X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT SMP Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Sun, Jan 25, 1998 at 01:36:29PM -0700, Nate Williams wrote: > > > > > Why don't we support cvs server in the base OS ? > > > > > > > > (I assume you mean the cvs pserver mode?) Why would we want to? > > > > > > And what gives you the impression we don't support it? > > > > Our /usr/src/contrib/cvs sources looked a bit stripped down. > > Somewhere (I think in the OpenBSD sources) I saw a sever subdir, > > OpenBSD has made many changes to their copy of CVS (in particular the > anonCVS stuff), so that may be what you are seeing. That's it... > The OpenBSD CVS sources aren't stock (or at least weren't last time I > looked at them.) Since they claim to be a very secure OS, it may be worth looking at their changes. -- Andreas Klemm powered by ,,symmetric multiprocessor FreeBSD''