From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 01:20:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6902516A41F for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 01:20:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36C0243D66 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 01:20:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2816E5D68; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 21:20:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 69499-01; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 21:20:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-76-130.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.76.130]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39DBE5CEC; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 21:20:48 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <43559F73.4010403@mac.com> Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 21:20:51 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stec John , freebsd Questions References: <00ca01c5d428$ec7b6fa0$df010a0a@csl.ws> <435585C2.6040006@mac.com> <013701c5d44a$3c4943b0$df010a0a@csl.ws> In-Reply-To: <013701c5d44a$3c4943b0$df010a0a@csl.ws> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: Subject: Re: ipfw2 - too many dynamic rules X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 01:20:54 -0000 Stec John wrote: > Hi Chuck, are you suggesting to add these dns rules on top of the existing > rules? Yes. > Can I use "allow" instead of "pass"? Yes, they mean the same thing: allow Allow packets that match rule. The search terminates. Aliases are pass, permit and accept. -- -Chuck