Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 23:43:53 -0400 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: Zach Leslie <xaque208@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, David Magda <dmagda@ee.ryerson.ca>, Chris Nehren <apeiron+freebsd-stable@isuckatdomains.net> Subject: Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ? Message-ID: <CAF6rxgnb-cnpQzY%2BvwvsiygW4nRg5Ktv-RuS1qv%2B0QVmMqO2yQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120602033328.GD50450@durance.local> References: <CAOgwaMvsv3e1TxDauV038Pp7LRiYeH7oAODE%2Bw-pxHt9oGrXMA@mail.gmail.com> <20120601121555.GF5335@home.opsec.eu> <4FC8B67D.5090208@digsys.bg> <20120601131236.GJ8591@macbook.bluepipe.net> <20120602010346.GA27660@isuckatdomains.members.linode.com> <4D744565-4073-485E-B769-82BE1F7E2C0A@ee.ryerson.ca> <20120602033328.GD50450@durance.local>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 1 June 2012 23:33, Zach Leslie <xaque208@gmail.com> wrote: >> So ZFS can ensure that bits-on-disk stay safe through checksums and mirr= oring / RAIDZ, while Gluster allows entire file servers to go offline and t= he files are still accessible because you have a kind of network-level RAID= going on. This also helps in performance since instead of clients pounding= on one file server (as usually happens with NFS), every write is sent to m= any data nodes so you're striping across many network elements. Think of it= as NFS on steroids. > > I don't know that new work in distributed filesystems, like Ceph > (http://ceph.com/), is inherently tied to Linux, but more that devs are > choosing Linux as a platform on which to build awesome projects. The question to ask here is what utilities, APIs, and features does Linux have which cause developers to use it instead and what could we do about it? --=20 Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgnb-cnpQzY%2BvwvsiygW4nRg5Ktv-RuS1qv%2B0QVmMqO2yQ>