Date: 30 Jun 99 04:02:31 PDT From: Jesus Monroy <jesus.monroy@usa.net> To: Sue Blake <sue@welearn.com.au>, UEBAYASHI Masao <masao@nf.enveng.titech.ac.jp> Cc: jesus.monroy@usa.net, kheuer@gwdu60.gwdg.de, freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [Re: [FreeBSD Man Pages]] Message-ID: <19990630110231.16124.qmail@nwcst290.netaddress.usa.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sue Blake <sue@welearn.com.au> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 1999 at 07:01:31PM +0900, UEBAYASHI Masao wrote:
> > > > Very incorrect. Just a few days ago I show that 15%
> > > > of the online whatis(1) and man(1) records where
> > > > incorrect.
> > > For one definition of "incorrect". What you showed does not detract=
> > > from the point that Konrad is making.
> > =
> > For my studying English, I think the _trick_ is that the first word
> > ``incorrect'' can be read as two cases.
> > =
> > If it was really trick, there is more stricter term of logic of
> > science for it, but I cannot remember it now...
> =
> No, I don't think it's any trick. Different things are being judged by
> these two people, that's all.
> =
There is nothing to judge here. Plainly documents are incorrect
and you are talking out your shoes (I'm trying to be nice.).
---
"I'd rather pay for my freedom than live in a bitmapped, =
pop-up-happy dungeon like NT."
http://www.performancecomputing.com/features/9809of1.shtml
____________________________________________________________________
Get free e-mail and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=3D=
1
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990630110231.16124.qmail>