From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 3 23:36:16 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2155D16A419 for ; Wed, 3 Oct 2007 23:36:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from morganw@chemikals.org) Received: from tiamat.relinetworks.com (tiamat.relinetworks.com [204.214.92.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B69F913C46A for ; Wed, 3 Oct 2007 23:36:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from morganw@chemikals.org) Received: from volatile.chemikals.org (root@r74-193-170-223.bssrcmta01.bscyla.by.dh.suddenlink.net [74.193.170.223] (may be forged)) by tiamat.relinetworks.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l93Na8dZ027655; Wed, 3 Oct 2007 19:36:08 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from morganw@chemikals.org) Received: from localhost (morganw@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by volatile.chemikals.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l93Na86J031613; Wed, 3 Oct 2007 18:36:08 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from morganw@chemikals.org) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 18:36:08 -0500 (CDT) From: Wes Morgan To: Aryeh Friedman In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <4702EA52.9050904@delphij.net> <4702ECCB.3010508@webvolution.net> <4703218B.7000603@webvolution.net> <47036164.4040609@moneybookers.com> <470368AA.30108@moneybookers.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Stefan Lambrev Subject: Re: small purposal for change in installworld X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 23:36:16 -0000 On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Aryeh Friedman wrote: >> Sorry I really do not understand what is your point. For me the main >> difference between linux and freebsd is documentation. >> FreeBSD is very well documented project , as far as I know there is no >> such beast as well documented linux distro :) >> For me FreeBSD community was (and still is) very helpful and never with >> attitude RTFM. >> If you consider my mail with examples and steps how to accomplish all >> that you asked for as RTFM attitude I just do not know what to say. > > Sorry for being a little abrasive... my main point is we should aim > for more of a "point and click" style of doing things... apple and ms > have done it pretty well for the average case. See the DesktopBSD project at http://www.desktopbsd.net.