From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jun 26 18:59:30 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0AA937B401
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 26 Jun 2003 18:59:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from axe-inc.co.jp (axegw.axe-inc.co.jp [61.199.217.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FE2C43FF5
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 26 Jun 2003 18:59:29 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from takawata@axe-inc.co.jp)
Received: from axe-inc.co.jp ([192.47.224.47])
	by axe-inc.co.jp (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W) with ESMTP id KAA02766;
	Fri, 27 Jun 2003 10:58:32 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <200306270158.KAA02766@axe-inc.co.jp>
To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <nick@garage.freebsd.pl>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 26 Jun 2003 19:50:35 +0200."
             <20030626175035.GY7587@garage.freebsd.pl>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 10:58:33 +0900
From: User Takawata <takawata@axe-inc.co.jp>
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Screen saver: bsd_saver.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 01:59:30 -0000

In message <20030626175035.GY7587@garage.freebsd.pl>, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote
:
>Hello there.
>
>I've wrote screen saver for FreeBSD 5.x with rotating "bsd" logo.
>
>	http://garage.freebsd.pl/bsd_saver.tbz
>
>Any chance to add it to tree?

I don't know whether it works or not, but this contains 
floating point instruction, which is hardly used and needs cafeful 
treatment. (As far as I know, FP instruction is used only on
i586_bcopy) What do you think about it?