From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Sep 10 11:10:58 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mail-blue.research.att.com (mail-blue.research.att.com [135.207.30.102]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30C0C14CC1 for ; Fri, 10 Sep 1999 11:10:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner@research.att.com) Received: from alliance.research.att.com (alliance.research.att.com [135.207.26.26]) by mail-blue.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E19834CE0C; Fri, 10 Sep 1999 14:10:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from windsor.research.att.com (windsor.research.att.com [135.207.26.46]) by alliance.research.att.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA05296; Fri, 10 Sep 1999 14:10:51 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Fenner Received: (from fenner@localhost) by windsor.research.att.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.5) id LAA29440; Fri, 10 Sep 1999 11:10:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199909101810.LAA29440@windsor.research.att.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII To: alex@cichlids.com Subject: Re: Refetch for bsd.port.mk on checksum errors Cc: ports@freebsd.org References: <199909101618.JAA26093@windsor.research.att.com> <19990910185215.A36627@cichlids.cichlids.com> Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 11:10:50 -0700 Versions: dmail (solaris) 2.2e/makemail 2.8u Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org What I'm worried about is the case where the md5 of the port doesn't match the md5 on the server because the file on the server has been updated and the port has not yet. This means that the first time you type "make", it will fetch the file completely twice, and future times it will refetch it, even if the fetches completely succeed. All of these extra fetches are a waste of time and bandwidth. Bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message