From owner-freebsd-bugs  Fri Jan  1 12:39:36 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA20701
          for freebsd-bugs-outgoing; Fri, 1 Jan 1999 12:39:36 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from opus.cts.cwu.edu (opus.cts.cwu.edu [198.104.92.71])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA20693;
          Fri, 1 Jan 1999 12:39:34 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from skynyrd@opus.cts.cwu.edu)
Received: from localhost (skynyrd@localhost)
	by opus.cts.cwu.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id MAA01649;
	Fri, 1 Jan 1999 12:39:10 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1999 12:39:09 -0800 (PST)
From: Chris Timmons <skynyrd@opus.cts.cwu.edu>
To: Steve Price <sprice@hiwaay.net>
cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG, pst@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Upgrading GNATS on freefall
In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.4.02.9812310950410.27052-100000@fly.HiWAAY.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990101123634.26439C-100000@opus.cts.cwu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


I think it would be a good idea; maybe Paul Traina has a word of wisdom to
contribute(?)

Also - it would probably be a good idea to try the latest bits against our
database someplace else before doing it on freefall...

-c

On Thu, 31 Dec 1998, Steve Price wrote:

> No we don't use customized states.  In fact the version of
> GNATS that we are using doesn't support this feature very
> well.  I suppose now would be as good a time as any to bring
> our version back up to speed.  Any objections to letting me
> upgrade GNATS on freefall?  One of the bigger problems is
> that the index of PRs triples in size, so anybody mirroring/
> CVSup'ing the GNATS database will see another ~1MB of data.
> 
> -steve


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message